Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0446

reference
404-tree-1
name
0446
tree-preservation-order

undefined

404-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.024913 50.890799)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.024856 50.890793,-1.024859 50.890804,-1.024867 50.890815,-1.024879 50.890823,-1.024895 50.890828,-1.024913 50.890830,-1.024930 50.890828,-1.024946 50.890823,-1.024959 50.890815,-1.024967 50.890805,-1.024970 50.890794,-1.024968 50.890783,-1.024960 50.890773,-1.024947 50.890765,-1.024932 50.890760,-1.024914 50.890758,-1.024896 50.890759,-1.024880 50.890764,-1.024868 50.890772,-1.024859 50.890782,-1.024856 50.890793)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL